AAPL vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and LDOS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dwarfs LDOS in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 147.54 times the 20.46 billion USD of its counterpart.
AAPL rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.27, hinting at bigger swings than LDOS’s steadier 0.66.
Symbol | AAPL | LDOS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apple Inc. | Leidos Holdings, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Consumer Electronics | Information Technology Services |
CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Thomas A. Bell |
Price | 202.09 USD | 158.94 USD |
Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 20.46 billion USD |
Beta | 1.275 | 0.661 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | October 17, 2006 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and LDOS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and LDOS, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AAPL | LDOS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 15.50 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.16 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 1.21 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 4.85 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 15.79 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 11.37 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 1.50 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 19.56 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AAPL at 0.50% and LDOS at 0.98% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet LDOS’s 0.98% yield, 96% above AAPL’s 0.50%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AAPL leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
Symbol | AAPL | LDOS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and LDOS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to LDOS, sitting at 1.54, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, LDOS lands at 1.42, with enough liquidity to spare.
- AAPL posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while LDOS at 10.06 handles interest with solid earnings.
Symbol | AAPL | LDOS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.54 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.42 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 1.35 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.43 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.06 |