Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAPL’s market capitalization of 3,189.54 billion USD is substantially larger than JBL’s 24.26 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.21 for AAPL and 1.14 for JBL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAAPLJBL
Company NameApple Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOTimothy D. CookMichael Dastoor
Price213.55 USD226.01 USD
Market Cap3,189.54 billion USD24.26 billion USD
Beta1.211.14
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980May 3, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAPL

151.31%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 151.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JBL

38.64%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAPL

47.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

AAPL’s Return on Invested Capital of 47.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

JBL

15.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAPL

24.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.30% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.02%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAPL

31.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.81% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)151.31%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.37%3.10%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)47.30%15.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.81%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.63%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAPL

0.82

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

0.98

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAPL

1.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

AAPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.47 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.59, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAPL

--

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AAPL is currently unavailable.

JBL

28.37

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 28.37 is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLJBL
Current Ratio (TTM)0.820.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.780.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.472.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.501.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--28.37

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAPL and JBL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAPL

0.47%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL

0.14%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAPL

15.74%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.74% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL

6.59%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.74%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAPL

32.91

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

AAPL’s P/E Ratio of 32.91 is within the middle range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

43.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 43.17 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAPL

3.79

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

JBL

2.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAPL

7.97

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 7.97, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Electronics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL

0.85

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAPL

47.94

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

At 47.94, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Electronics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

19.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 19.38, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AAPL vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.9143.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.792.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.970.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)47.9419.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)32.3919.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4724.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.140.91