AAPL vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and HIMS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing HIMS’s 12.50 billion USD by roughly 241.54×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.85 for HIMS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Hims & Hers Health, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Household & Personal Products |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Andrew Dudum |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 58 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 12.50 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.85 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | September 13, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and HIMS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and HIMS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 78.32 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 7.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 23.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 52.02 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 99.09 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 6.89 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 51.15 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas HIMS appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and HIMS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while HIMS at 1.59 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas HIMS at 1.32 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither AAPL nor HIMS records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | AAPL | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.32 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.07 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |