Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and FOUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing FOUR’s 5.89 billion USD by roughly 512.20×.

With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.80 for FOUR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolAAPLFOUR
Company NameApple Inc.Shift4 Payments, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOMr. Timothy D. CookMr. Jared Isaacman
Price202.09 USD87.34 USD
Market Cap3,018.38 billion USD5.89 billion USD
Beta1.271.80
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980June 5, 2020
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and FOUR, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAAPLFOUR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.1427.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.851.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.541.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)45.367.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)30.6512.47
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.24-20.81
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.712.19
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)31.3616.10

Dividend Comparison

AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas FOUR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

SymbolAAPLFOUR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while FOUR at 1.36 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FOUR at 1.36 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
  • FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to AAPL at 1.47, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
  • AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FOUR (at 3.05) covers its interest obligations.
SymbolAAPLFOUR
Current Ratio (TTM)0.821.36
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.781.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.473.58
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--3.05