AAPL vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and ERIC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing ERIC’s 29.42 billion USD by roughly 102.60×.
AAPL’s beta of 1.27 points to much larger expected swings compared to ERIC’s calmer 0.44, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ERIC is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AAPL, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | AAPL | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) |
| Country | US | SE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Anthony F. Bartolo |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 8.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 29.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 0.44 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | August 24, 1981 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and ERIC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and ERIC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ERIC features a high P/E of 175.63, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to AAPL at 31.14, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
- ERIC shows a negative forward PEG of -63.27, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AAPL at 2.85 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AAPL | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 175.63 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | -63.27 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 3.29 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 6.71 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 6.12 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 1.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 6.66 |
Dividend Comparison
ERIC stands out with a 3.28% dividend yield—around 556% above AAPL’s 0.50%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AAPL | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 3.28% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and ERIC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ERIC at 1.09 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ERIC at 0.88 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas ERIC (at 6.76) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.15 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.76 |