AAPL vs. EA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and EA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing EA’s 37.74 billion USD by roughly 79.98×.
AAPL’s beta of 1.27 points to much larger expected swings compared to EA’s calmer 0.75, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | AAPL | EA |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apple Inc. | Electronic Arts Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Consumer Electronics | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Andrew Wilson |
Price | 202.09 USD | 150.5 USD |
Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 37.74 billion USD |
Beta | 1.27 | 0.75 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | September 20, 1989 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and EA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and EA, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AAPL | EA |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 35.17 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 1.86 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 5.06 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 6.17 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 20.31 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 20.20 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 5.04 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 20.21 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AAPL and EA offer similar dividend yields (0.50% vs. 0.50%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
Symbol | AAPL | EA |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and EA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.82 and 0.95, both AAPL and EA have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas EA at 0.95 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas EA (at 20.61) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | AAPL | EA |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 0.95 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.95 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.31 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.16 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 20.61 |