AAPL vs. AUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and AUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing AUR’s 10.72 billion USD by roughly 281.58×.
AUR carries a higher beta at 2.77, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AAPL remains steadier at 1.27.
| Symbol | AAPL | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Aurora Innovation, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 6.06 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 10.72 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 2.77 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | May 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and AUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and AUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR shows a negative P/E of -13.36, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AAPL at 31.14 trades on solid profitability.
- AUR reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAPL at 30.65 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAPL | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | -13.36 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 0.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 5.92 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | -16.83 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | -13.53 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | -16.74 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas AUR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and AUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while AUR at 9.54 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas AUR at 9.54 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither AAPL nor AUR records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | AAPL | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 9.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 9.54 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.06 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.06 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |