AAPL vs. APP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and APP, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dwarfs APP in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 24.89 times the 121.26 billion USD of its counterpart.
APP dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 2.39, while AAPL keeps it calmer at 1.27.
| Symbol | AAPL | APP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | AppLovin Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 358.35 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 121.26 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.275 | 2.392 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | April 15, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and APP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and APP, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | APP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 63.43 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.43 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 23.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 211.64 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 47.87 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 47.30 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 24.23 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 49.12 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL’s 0.50% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike APP, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AAPL’s balanced approach against APP’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | AAPL | APP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and APP, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to APP, sitting at 1.68, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, APP lands at 1.68, with enough liquidity to spare.
- APP’s 6.45 D/E breaches 3.0, loading up on debt that could test its resilience. In contrast, AAPL at 1.47 plays it closer to the vest with borrowing.
- AAPL posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while APP at 7.41 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | AAPL | APP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.68 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.68 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 6.45 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.65 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 7.41 |