Seek Returns logo

AAP vs. KMX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAP and KMX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

KMX’s market capitalization of 10.76 billion USD is significantly greater than AAP’s 3.09 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.09 for AAP and 1.38 for KMX, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAAPKMX
Company NameAdvance Auto Parts, Inc.CarMax, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailAuto - Dealerships
CEOShane M. O'KellyWilliam D. Nash CPA
Price51.62 USD70.61 USD
Market Cap3.09 billion USD10.76 billion USD
Beta1.091.38
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 29, 2001February 4, 1997
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAP and KMX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAP vs. KMX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAP

-14.70%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AAP has a negative Return on Equity of -14.70%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KMX

8.96%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
28.79%
Q3
15.58%
Median
9.02%
Q1
-10.07%
Min
-35.39%

KMX’s Return on Equity of 8.96% is on par with the norm for the Auto - Dealerships industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAP

-8.92%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

AAP has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -8.92%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

KMX

0.10%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
14.67%
Q3
8.34%
Median
6.56%
Q1
0.65%
Min
-4.67%

KMX’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Auto - Dealerships industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAP

-3.74%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

AAP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.74%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KMX

2.08%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-0.32%
Min
-0.47%

KMX’s Net Profit Margin of 2.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Auto - Dealerships industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAP

-9.34%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

AAP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KMX

0.13%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
8.99%
Q3
5.53%
Median
4.28%
Q1
-1.91%
Min
-11.10%

KMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.13% is around the midpoint for the Auto - Dealerships industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPKMX
Return on Equity (TTM)-14.70%8.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)-3.31%2.04%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-8.92%0.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3.74%2.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-9.34%0.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.96%11.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAP

1.27

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AAP’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMX

2.39

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.54
Median
1.33
Q1
1.07
Min
0.77

KMX’s Current Ratio of 2.39 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Auto - Dealerships industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAP

1.67

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AAP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KMX

2.85

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.44
Median
1.76
Q1
0.50
Min
0.01

KMX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85 is typical for the Auto - Dealerships industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAP

-10.54

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AAP has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -10.54. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KMX

0.04

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
3.13
Median
1.99
Q1
0.03
Min
-1.62

KMX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.04 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPKMX
Current Ratio (TTM)1.272.39
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.490.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.672.85
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.350.65
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-3.7810.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-10.540.04

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAP and KMX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAP

1.94%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.94%, AAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KMX

0.00%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
2.73%
Q3
0.59%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAP

-17.02%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAP has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -17.02%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

KMX

0.00%

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
34.61%
Q3
9.34%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPKMX
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.94%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)-17.02%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAP

-8.80

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AAP has a negative P/E Ratio of -8.80. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

KMX

19.23

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
31.48
Q3
20.01
Median
14.07
Q1
11.52
Min
10.40

KMX’s P/E Ratio of 19.23 is within the middle range for the Auto - Dealerships industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAP

-0.19

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AAP has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.19. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

KMX

1.65

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.32
Median
1.63
Q1
0.62
Min
0.46

KMX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.65 is within the middle range of its peers in the Auto - Dealerships industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAP

0.33

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, AAP’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KMX

0.40

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
3.42
Q3
1.74
Median
0.45
Q1
0.28
Min
0.19

KMX’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Auto - Dealerships industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAP

1.41

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KMX

1.71

Auto - Dealerships Industry

Max
6.16
Q3
3.70
Median
1.91
Q1
1.56
Min
0.81

KMX’s P/B Ratio of 1.71 is within the conventional range for the Auto - Dealerships industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAP vs. KMX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Auto - Dealerships industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPKMX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-8.8019.23
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.191.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.330.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.411.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-12.4819.89
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-9.6316.34
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.541.06