AAL vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AAL and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AAL	VRT
Company Name	American Airlines Group Inc.	Vertiv Holdings Co
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	8.45 billion USD	48.70 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	September 27, 2005	August 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	VRT
5-Day Price Return	-0.16%	-3.76%
13-Week Price Return	7.93%	19.87%
26-Week Price Return	-18.68%	16.71%
52-Week Price Return	24.15%	61.69%
Month-to-Date Return	11.40%	-12.40%
Year-to-Date Return	-26.56%	12.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	60.62M	6.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume	62.18M	7.70M
3-Month Volatility	53.18%	40.24%
Beta	1.40	1.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.05%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.82%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	VRT
Return on Equity (TTM)	265.62%	32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.90%	8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.05%	8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.82%	13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	64.95%	35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.58

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.58	1.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.44	1.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	157.71	0.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.75	2.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

15.38

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

At 15.38, AAL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AAL vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	VRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.38	59.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.16	5.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	75.06	15.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.16	39.11