Seek Returns logo

AAL vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAL and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAALRSG
Company NameAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Republic Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization8.45 billion USD73.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 27, 2005July 1, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAALRSG
5-Day Price Return-0.16%1.55%
13-Week Price Return7.93%-5.70%
26-Week Price Return-18.68%5.18%
52-Week Price Return24.15%15.20%
Month-to-Date Return11.40%2.37%
Year-to-Date Return-26.56%17.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume60.62M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume62.18M1.35M
3-Month Volatility53.18%18.33%
Beta1.400.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.05%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.82%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAALRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)265.62%18.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.90%6.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.05%12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%20.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.95%42.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.58

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAALRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.580.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)157.711.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.754.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RSG

0.96%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAALRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

15.38

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 15.38, AAL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RSG

34.91

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 34.91 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RSG

4.53

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.53 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AAL vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAALRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3834.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.164.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)75.066.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.1631.49