Seek Returns logo

AAL vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAL and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAALROP
Company NameAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Roper Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesSoftware
Market Capitalization8.31 billion USD48.34 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 27, 2005February 13, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAALROP
5-Day Price Return-4.13%-0.07%
13-Week Price Return-3.11%-15.13%
26-Week Price Return3.74%-22.11%
52-Week Price Return-8.92%-21.31%
Month-to-Date Return-2.82%0.75%
Year-to-Date Return-26.79%-13.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume52.31M0.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume70.06M0.88M
3-Month Volatility44.95%22.05%
Beta1.270.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
51.60%
Q3
26.80%
Median
15.05%
Q1
3.96%
Min
-19.21%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.30%
Q1
2.19%
Min
-5.16%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.11% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ROP

20.34%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.34% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.93%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
-2.77%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.93% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ROP

28.13%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.13% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAALROP
Return on Equity (TTM)265.62%8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.96%4.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.11%20.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.93%28.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.01%68.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.54

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.91
Median
0.68
Q1
0.51
Min
0.19

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.54 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROP

0.58

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.58 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
4.67
Median
1.26
Q1
0.81
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ROP

0.47

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

ROP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAALROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.540.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.390.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)157.710.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7580.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
3.61%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROP

0.72%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
93.13%
Q3
51.43%
Median
14.52%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROP

22.08%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 22.08%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAALROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

13.99

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.99
Q3
10.90
Median
8.70
Q1
6.40
Min
2.58

A P/E Ratio of 13.99 places AAL in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ROP

30.61

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 30.61 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.48
Q3
0.83
Median
0.61
Q1
0.37
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROP

6.23

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 6.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
3.03
Median
2.07
Q1
1.28
Min
0.49

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROP

2.68

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 2.68 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AAL vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAALROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9930.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.166.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)75.062.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.0219.99