AAL vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAL and MMM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MMM stands out with 80.40 billion USD in market value—about 10.85× AAL’s market cap of 7.41 billion USD.
With betas of 1.32 for AAL and 1.08 for MMM, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAL | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Airlines Group Inc. | 3M Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Conglomerates |
| CEO | Mr. Robert D. Isom Jr. | Mr. William M. Brown |
| Price | 11.24 USD | 149.4 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.41 billion USD | 80.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.32 | 1.08 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | September 27, 2005 | January 14, 1946 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAL and MMM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAL and MMM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AAL has a negative P/B ratio of -1.64, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). MMM, with a P/B of 18.20, maintains positive shareholder equity.
- MMM reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -1165.28, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAL at 2.11 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAL | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 10.81 | 18.63 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.20 | 2.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.14 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -1.64 | 18.20 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 2.11 | -1165.28 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 10.27 | 13.36 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.80 | 3.60 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 12.27 | -1277.47 |
Dividend Comparison
AAL offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MMM provides a 1.89% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AAL | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.89% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAL and MMM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAL’s current ratio of 0.52 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MMM at 1.66 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAL’s quick ratio of 0.42 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MMM at 1.25 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAL shows negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -8.12), while MMM is heavily leveraged (3.15), illustrating two different balance-sheet risks.
| Symbol | AAL | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.52 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 1.25 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -8.12 | 3.15 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.58 | 0.35 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.25 | 4.45 |