AAL vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAL and LUV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
LUV stands out with 18.10 billion USD in market value—about 2.44× AAL’s market cap of 7.41 billion USD.
With betas of 1.32 for AAL and 1.18 for LUV, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAL | LUV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Airlines Group Inc. | Southwest Airlines Co. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| CEO | Mr. Robert D. Isom Jr. | Mr. Robert E. Jordan |
| Price | 11.24 USD | 31.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.41 billion USD | 18.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.32 | 1.18 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | September 27, 2005 | January 2, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAL and LUV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAL and LUV based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AAL has a negative P/B ratio of -1.64, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). LUV, with a P/B of 1.98, maintains positive shareholder equity.
- LUV reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -32.15, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAL at 2.11 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAL | LUV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 10.81 | 33.97 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.20 | 0.92 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.14 | 0.66 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -1.64 | 1.98 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 2.11 | -32.15 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 10.27 | 6.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.65 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 12.27 | -31.90 |
Dividend Comparison
AAL offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while LUV provides a 2.27% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AAL | LUV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.27% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAL and LUV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.52 and 0.77, both AAL and LUV have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AAL (quick ratio 0.42) and LUV (quick ratio 0.72) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AAL has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -8.12), an unusual warning sign, while LUV at 0.85 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | AAL | LUV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.52 | 0.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.72 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -8.12 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.58 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.25 | 2.88 |