AAL vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAL and GPN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
GPN stands out with 18.47 billion USD in market value—about 2.49× AAL’s market cap of 7.41 billion USD.
With betas of 1.32 for AAL and 0.97 for GPN, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAL | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Airlines Group Inc. | Global Payments Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Specialty Business Services |
| CEO | Mr. Robert D. Isom Jr. | Mr. Robert M. Cortopassi |
| Price | 11.24 USD | 75.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.41 billion USD | 18.47 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.32 | 0.97 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | September 27, 2005 | January 16, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAL and GPN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAL and GPN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AAL has a negative P/B ratio of -1.64, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). GPN, with a P/B of 0.84, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | AAL | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 10.81 | 11.96 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.20 | 0.72 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.14 | 1.83 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -1.64 | 0.84 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 2.11 | 6.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 10.27 | 7.12 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.80 | 3.22 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 12.27 | 10.78 |
Dividend Comparison
AAL offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while GPN provides a 1.32% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AAL | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.32% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAL and GPN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.52 and 0.94, both AAL and GPN have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AAL’s quick ratio of 0.42 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas GPN at 0.94 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAL has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -8.12), an unusual warning sign, while GPN at 0.76 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | AAL | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.52 | 0.94 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.94 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -8.12 | 0.76 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.58 | 0.36 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.25 | 3.88 |