Seek Returns logo

AAL vs. FERG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAL and FERG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAALFERG
Company NameAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization8.45 billion USD46.27 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 27, 2005January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and FERG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. FERG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAALFERG
5-Day Price Return-0.16%1.12%
13-Week Price Return7.93%25.86%
26-Week Price Return-18.68%25.64%
52-Week Price Return24.15%11.52%
Month-to-Date Return11.40%3.24%
Year-to-Date Return-26.56%32.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume60.62M1.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume62.18M1.50M
3-Month Volatility53.18%37.78%
Beta1.401.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FERG

28.84%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FERG’s Return on Equity of 28.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.05%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FERG

5.32%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FERG’s Net Profit Margin of 5.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.82%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FERG

8.25%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FERG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.25% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAALFERG
Return on Equity (TTM)265.62%28.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.90%9.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.05%5.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.82%8.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.95%30.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.58

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FERG

1.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FERG’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FERG

0.74

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FERG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FERG

14.77

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

FERG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.77 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAALFERG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.581.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)157.710.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7514.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FERG

1.42%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Yield of 1.42% is consistent with its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FERG

56.55%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.55% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAALFERG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%56.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

15.38

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 15.38, AAL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FERG

28.25

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 28.25 places FERG in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FERG

1.50

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

FERG’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FERG

6.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

FERG’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AAL vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAALFERG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3828.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.161.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)75.066.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.1632.69