Seek Returns logo

AAL vs. EMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAL and EMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

EMR’s market capitalization of 78.62 billion USD is significantly greater than AAL’s 7.71 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.38 for AAL and 1.27 for EMR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAALEMR
Company NameAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Emerson Electric Co.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryAirlines, Airports & Air ServicesIndustrial - Machinery
CEORobert D. Isom Jr.Surendralal Lanca Karsanbhai
Price11.69 USD139.76 USD
Market Cap7.71 billion USD78.62 billion USD
Beta1.381.27
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 27, 2005June 1, 1972
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and EMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. EMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAL

-15.15%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
42.21%
Q3
26.98%
Median
13.01%
Q1
0.37%
Min
-17.14%

AAL has a negative Return on Equity of -15.15%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EMR

11.66%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 11.66% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAL

4.12%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
17.34%
Q3
13.78%
Median
4.53%
Q1
1.05%
Min
-13.54%

AAL’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.12% is in line with the norm for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

EMR

6.54%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

EMR’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.54% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAL

1.26%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
24.88%
Q3
9.50%
Median
3.91%
Q1
-1.02%
Min
-10.56%

AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EMR

13.60%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

EMR’s Net Profit Margin of 13.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAL

4.31%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
22.38%
Q3
14.22%
Median
9.66%
Q1
-0.09%
Min
-12.58%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.31% is around the midpoint for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR

18.31%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

EMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.31% is around the midpoint for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAALEMR
Return on Equity (TTM)-15.15%11.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.09%5.71%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.12%6.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.26%13.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.31%18.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.28%51.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAL

0.52

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.77
Q3
1.68
Median
0.77
Q1
0.62
Min
0.32

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EMR

0.80

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAL

-8.12

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
3.85
Q3
2.92
Median
1.02
Q1
0.43
Min
0.04

AAL has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -8.12, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

EMR

0.77

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

EMR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Industrial - Machinery industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAL

1.25

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
8.60
Q3
6.00
Median
4.19
Q1
1.03
Min
-1.40

AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR

15.21

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.21 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAALEMR
Current Ratio (TTM)0.520.80
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.420.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-8.120.77
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.580.35
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.512.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.2515.21

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAL and EMR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAL

0.00%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
162.17%
Q3
2.10%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EMR

1.51%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.51%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAL

0.00%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
106.87%
Q3
15.62%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EMR

50.06%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.06% is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAALEMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%50.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAL

11.24

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
24.07
Q3
18.40
Median
12.44
Q1
11.24
Min
7.21

AAL’s P/E Ratio of 11.24 is within the middle range for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EMR

32.85

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 32.85 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAL

0.21

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.07
Median
0.61
Q1
0.32
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry.

EMR

3.50

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAL

0.14

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.69
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.14 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EMR

4.47

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAL

-1.71

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
12.86
Q3
8.15
Median
2.07
Q1
1.50
Min
0.62

AAL has a negative P/B Ratio of -1.71, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

EMR

4.09

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAL vs. EMR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Industrial - Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAALEMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)11.2432.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.213.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.144.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-1.714.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)2.1928.46
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.3420.17
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.805.20