AAL vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AAL and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AAL	EME
Company Name	American Airlines Group Inc.	EMCOR Group, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	8.58 billion USD	27.27 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	September 27, 2005	January 10, 1995
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	EME
5-Day Price Return	-1.66%	0.34%
13-Week Price Return	14.04%	32.91%
26-Week Price Return	-18.75%	40.09%
52-Week Price Return	28.21%	63.42%
Month-to-Date Return	13.14%	-2.92%
Year-to-Date Return	-25.42%	34.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume	66.73M	0.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume	62.41M	0.42M
3-Month Volatility	55.41%	28.00%
Beta	1.41	1.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.05%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.82%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	EME
Return on Equity (TTM)	265.62%	37.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.90%	14.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.05%	7.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.82%	9.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	64.95%	19.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.58

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	EME
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.58	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.44	1.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	157.71	0.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.75	490.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	EME
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	4.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

15.38

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

At 15.38, AAL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EME

24.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.48 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EME

1.73

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AAL vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	EME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.38	24.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.16	1.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	75.06	7.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.16	22.38