Seek Returns logo

A vs. FMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at A and FMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A is a standard domestic listing, while FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAFMS
Company NameAgilent Technologies, Inc.Fresenius Medical Care AG
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization40.15 billion USD15.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1999September 17, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of A and FMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

A vs. FMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
5-Day Price Return14.46%4.17%
13-Week Price Return16.69%-4.77%
26-Week Price Return21.08%-0.85%
52-Week Price Return-3.34%20.38%
Month-to-Date Return10.35%1.86%
Year-to-Date Return5.43%3.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M0.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.84M0.54M
3-Month Volatility33.89%21.87%
Beta1.270.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

A

19.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

A’s Return on Equity of 19.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

A

17.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A’s Net Profit Margin of 17.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

A

21.26%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

A’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.97%4.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.14%2.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.97%3.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%7.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.92%24.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

A

2.25

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

A’s Current Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

A

0.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

A’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

A

254.50

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 254.50, A demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.251.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)254.505.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

A vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

A vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

A

0.71%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.71%, A offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FMS

3.20%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

A

22.95%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

A’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.95% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.71%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.95%187.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

A

32.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

A’s P/E Ratio of 32.40 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS

20.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 20.14 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

A

5.82

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

A’s P/S Ratio of 5.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS

0.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

A

5.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

A’s P/B Ratio of 5.12 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.4020.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.820.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.121.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.336.56