Seek Returns logo

A vs. FMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at A and FMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A is a standard domestic listing, while FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAFMS
Company NameAgilent Technologies, Inc.Fresenius Medical Care AG
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization41.68 billion USD13.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1999September 17, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of A and FMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

A vs. FMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
5-Day Price Return0.31%-1.68%
13-Week Price Return23.17%-5.40%
26-Week Price Return27.20%-21.70%
52-Week Price Return9.34%-2.93%
Month-to-Date Return0.31%-13.12%
Year-to-Date Return9.29%-8.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.58M0.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.67M0.58M
3-Month Volatility29.31%27.67%
Beta1.280.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

A

19.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
23.81%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.51%
Q1
3.14%
Min
-6.95%

In the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, A’s Return on Equity of 19.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.67%
Q3
15.54%
Median
8.37%
Q1
5.49%
Min
-2.09%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

A

17.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.77%
Q3
17.97%
Median
8.97%
Q1
3.80%
Min
-11.89%

A’s Net Profit Margin of 17.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
9.33%
Q3
4.80%
Median
2.90%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-3.28%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

A

21.26%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
31.55%
Q3
21.26%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.54%
Min
0.11%

A’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
8.71%
Median
5.10%
Q1
2.10%
Min
-3.07%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.97%4.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.14%2.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.97%3.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%7.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.92%24.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

A

2.25

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.87
Median
1.75
Q1
1.37
Min
0.57

A’s Current Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.56
Median
1.28
Q1
0.92
Min
0.01

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

A

0.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
0.95
Q3
0.70
Median
0.45
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

A’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.41
Q3
1.39
Median
0.74
Q1
0.46
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

A

254.50

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 254.50, A demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.46
Median
4.52
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.251.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)254.505.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

A vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

A vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

A

0.67%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.02%
Q3
0.67%
Median
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

A’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FMS

3.59%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.51%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.06%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.59%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

A

22.95%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
97.67%
Q3
61.34%
Median
18.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

A’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.95% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
187.56%
Q3
81.14%
Median
33.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 187.56% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%3.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.95%187.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

A

34.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
78.22
Q3
57.42
Median
34.18
Q1
28.39
Min
1.55

A’s P/E Ratio of 34.12 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS

17.91

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
48.86
Q3
32.22
Median
21.78
Q1
13.97
Min
8.01

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 17.91 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

A

6.13

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.69
Q3
6.37
Median
4.95
Q1
3.27
Min
1.04

A’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS

0.60

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.66
Q3
1.64
Median
0.72
Q1
0.27
Min
0.10

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

A

5.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
5.04
Median
3.94
Q1
2.12
Min
1.13

A’s P/B Ratio of 5.12 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.33
Median
2.48
Q1
1.31
Min
0.65

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

A vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.1217.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.130.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.121.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.265.83