Seek Returns logo

A vs. ATR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at A and ATR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAATR
Company NameAgilent Technologies, Inc.AptarGroup, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareMaterials
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization39.92 billion USD8.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1999April 23, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of A and ATR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

A vs. ATR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAATR
5-Day Price Return1.52%-1.18%
13-Week Price Return16.08%-17.60%
26-Week Price Return28.39%-11.48%
52-Week Price Return-2.14%-17.06%
Month-to-Date Return9.71%-1.53%
Year-to-Date Return4.82%-16.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.01M0.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.76M0.43M
3-Month Volatility34.01%24.82%
Beta1.270.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

A

19.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

A’s Return on Equity of 19.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ATR

15.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

A

17.97%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A’s Net Profit Margin of 17.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ATR

10.86%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

A

21.26%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

A’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR

14.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.26% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAATR
Return on Equity (TTM)19.97%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.14%8.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.97%10.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%14.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.92%38.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

A

2.25

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

A’s Current Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

A

0.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

A’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

A

254.50

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 254.50, A demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ATR

16.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.67, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAATR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.251.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.710.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.40
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)254.5016.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

A vs. ATR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

A vs. ATR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

A

0.70%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.70%, A offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ATR

1.38%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

A

22.95%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

A’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.95% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATR

30.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.61% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAATR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.70%1.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.95%30.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

A

32.99

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

A’s P/E Ratio of 32.99 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATR

22.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 22.12 places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

A

5.93

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

A’s P/S Ratio of 5.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ATR

2.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, ATR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

A

5.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

A’s P/B Ratio of 5.12 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

A vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAATR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.9922.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.932.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.123.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.9925.35